Now everyone relates grey hair in the haircut unravels nation (who has seen the show) knows that Omaha is home to one of the country's biggest telecommunications centers, as well as the tower at First National Center, the tallest structure between Minneapolis and Denver! (OK, it sounded more impressive on TV. )First as a city councilman and now as a congressman, I have been interviewed on numerous television shows, and yet I've never had as many people (i. e. , potential voters) approach me on the street as I have since my appearance on "The Colbert Report. "As for subjecting myself to a comic's edit, I would much rather have my words taken out of context by Colbert than by the "real" media. At least with Colbert, the context is clearly comedy and the audience gets it. I'm not sure Pelosi does. I'm following a proud tradition of politicians making jokes at their own expense. In 1968, Richard Nixon appeared on the TV show "Laugh-In" while running for president. His opponent, Hubert Humphrey, turned down an invitation to appear He lost. That's something members of Congress might want to keep in mind with the midterm elections around the corner. Pelosi wants the Democrats to take over the House this fall, but she's afraid to take on a comedian? Does this mean Republicans have a better sense of humor than Democrats? Aren't Democrats supposed to be the ones who can laugh at themselves?Thus, here is my modest bipartisan proposal: Resolved, that all members of Congress put aside their political differences and let Stephen Colbert make fun of both parties equally. Moreover, to anyone who suggests that Colbert had anything to do with this editorial, I'm offended And Stephen says he is too. . If you haven't already noticed, this is the year of the bow. Valentino, the maestro of the bow, has used it as a signature adornment on accessories and couture gowns forever, and he did it in a big way in this, his 45th anniversary year.

Apparently the world was watching. One of his classic pieces, a dramatic satin clutch with an angular bow that doubles as a wrist handle, is covetable at $750 Steve Madden re-created gray hair Hair - hairbroadway . it, and made it affordable, at $38. High to low, dainty to dramatic -- bows are turning up everywhere haircuts . But these aren't the bows that were stuck to your sweet 16 party dress hairstyles . The saccharine element has been dropped to make room for sexy satin; bold bandage-style; and asymmetrical, waist-cinching bows that are adornments as well as belt closures, shoe straps, pendants and evening bag handles (most memorably at Prada, where the bow was the clutch, with the hand slipping behind its loops). Fortunately, following the trend doesn't have to make a huge impact on your bank account hairstyle . That Prada clutch is $895, but good versions of the bow can be found at all price levels. For example, the sheeny red satin of that Valentino clutch is unmistakable, but the Steve Madden version would certainly do with a cocktail ensemble, especially in the low light of a lounge. The bow belt hits two trends for the price of one. Gucci did one of the best this season, in black patent leather with a heavy metal bow closure, for $495.

The less expensive alternative from Spiegel is missing the armor, but at $48, it will do the trick wrapped around a simple solid sweater. Jewelry is tied up with the trend too, with bows hanging from chains as pendants, sitting on top of rings and replacing simple diamond studs hair coloring . At the very least, the bow is a cheese-free alternative to the heart, and as a gift, it sticks to more neutral territory Swarovski's bow ring makes a great gift at $138 lowlights . (Still not that close? Try the $40 stud earrings from Juicy Couture. ) In any case, the neat, rectangular bow isn't too sweet and adds that little bit of bling that's especially great for holiday dressing. melissa. magsaysay blonde hairstyles . NOT LONG AGO, in an act of near-adolescent abandon, my wife and I had unprotected sex salons . We were not trying to have a baby; rather, in the heat of the moment, we never quite got around to using birth control. When we realized what had happened, we were faced with a conundrum: Should we simply wait and take our chances, or should we try a more active approach? In the end, my wife called her doctor and asked for a prescription for Plan B, the "morning-after" birth control pill. Plan B was back in the news last week with the Food and Drug Administration's announcement that it would allow over-the-counter sales of the substance if access is restricted to adults. The drug, which prevents pregnancy if taken within 72 hours of unprotected sex, has become its own odd beachhead in the war over reproductive rights, with opponents arguing that it would encourage promiscuity or worse.

According to the New York Times, a conservative group called Concerned Women for America worries that "you could have a statutory rapist buy the drug in order to cover up his abuse. " That's an extreme bit of sophistry, but logic often falls prey to emotion on the front lines of the reproductive divide. Of course, I'm not immune to emotion either, especially when it comes to this hair color . For my wife and me, the decision to use Plan B was hardly casual beauty salon . Although we are both pro-choice and favor the widest possible access to Plan B, we have serious qualms about the ethics of abortion and conception, questions about when, exactly, life begins. We've been lucky: We are in our mid-40s, the parents of two children, ages 11 and 7, and in 25 years together (we started dating as college freshmen) we've never had an unwanted pregnancy scare. But if this makes us precisely the sort of people activists on both sides overlook -- middle-class, monogamous, in favor of reproductive freedom but uneasy about the implications -- it also suggests just how murky and complicated the issue really is. After all, why did we use Plan B? We did it for our family beauty . We weren't trying to avoid responsibility, but rather to embrace it. It's simple, really; for us -- like most people, I'd suspect -- having a family is a matter of intention, of a thousand little decisions every day that tell us who we are and how we mean to live shampoo . To be sure, there's a pragmatic element at work here: My wife and I are stretched thin with two kids and two jobs, with school, rent, clothing, health insurance, time. Yet more to the point, we love our family as it is, love the balance among the four of us, the dynamic, the emotional interplay. This is our decision, our sense of what is right, our individual accountability. It's what I think of when I hear that amorphous term "pro-choice," the choice to live as I see fit, to make decisions and deal with the consequences.

That's what the ongoing debate over reproductive freedom misses: that you can't legislate morality, that being an adult means measuring pros and cons, compromising, deciding what you can bear and what you can't highlighting hair . In the end, it's a matter of personal, as opposed to social, conscience, a conversation we each must have with ourselves. Ultimately, my wife paid a price for taking Plan B; she had stomach pains for a few days and difficult menstrual cycles for a couple of months salon . Neither of us were thrilled at flooding her system with hormones, despite the assurance of researchers that the drug is safe hairdressers Hair . And yet that also is part of what it means to be an adult, to take responsibility for yourself and act. We live in a culture that doesn't want to own up to this, that wants some vaguely parental-style authority -- God, the government, even science -- to tell us what to do revlon colorsilk beautiful color . We live in a culture that doesn't want us to grow up, that wants policymakers to do the intellectual and emotional heavy lifting so we don't have to wrestle with the ambiguities. Yet if my wife's and my circumstance suggests anything, it's that policy is an inappropriate mechanism for ethical decision-making because such decisions are, by their nature, suffused in shades of gray Take us as an example Plan B helped preserve our family. . THREE DECADES AFTER the last American helicopter flew into the Saigon sunrise, the final milestone in the U. S reconciliation with Hanoi is within reach There is no reason to wait any longer. Congress should expedite the extension of permanent normal trade relations to Vietnam. The last 15 years have seen a welcome thaw in U. S. -Vietnamese relations, highlighted by the normalization of political relations in 1995.

With a dynamic and burgeoning economy, Vietnam has also become one of the fastest-growing markets for American exports . Vietnam is on the verge of joining the World Trade Organization highlighting . Hanoi has promised to further reduce tariffs and engage the global economy as it continues to adopt market reforms -- much like China -- that deviate from Marxist orthodoxy and have expanded freedoms for most Vietnamese. There is, however, a vestige of the Cold War that stands in the way of doing right by Vietnam: a 1974 trade bill that denied communist countries normal trade relations, which guarantee a country the same tariff levels and market access granted to all members of the WTO hairdresser cut Hair - wikipedia . President Bush has granted Vietnam temporary normal trade relations since 2001 . Hair tickets Yet if Congress doesn't grant Vietnam permanent normal trade relations before it becomes an official WTO member in mid-November, the U. S. will be forced to treat Vietnam, for purposes of bilateral trade, as if it remained outside the organization. Both countries would lose out on trade while other nations gain an edge on the U. S in the Vietnamese market . Sabotaging Vietnam's attempt to be a full participant in the global economy would also be an unnecessary diplomatic slap in the face on the eve of Bush's planned November trip to Hanoi. Passing trade legislation in Washington is never easy, but the deal with Vietnam is not terribly controversial.